Opened 16 years ago
Closed 16 years ago
#248 closed enhancement (fixed)
Various doc improvements
Reported by: | Peter Kovacs | Owned by: | Peter Kovacs |
---|---|---|---|
Priority: | major | Milestone: | LEMON 1.1 release |
Component: | core | Version: | hg main |
Keywords: | Cc: | ||
Revision id: |
Description
Attachments (2)
Change History (7)
Changed 16 years ago by
Attachment: | doc-impr-259f61026d81.patch added |
---|
comment:1 follow-up: 2 Changed 16 years ago by
comment:2 Changed 16 years ago by
Replying to kpeter:
[259f61026d81] contains various doc improvements:
I like most of the changes, but
- Use LaTeX-style O(...) expressions everywhere.
I'm not 100% sure if it is a good idea.
Firstly, it slows down the doc generation. Secondly, LaTeX expressions have a major drawback that they do not (always) scale with the surrounding text when zooming. Sometimes, the expressions differ in size from the text even using the default browser settings.
Thus I prefer to keep the simple text for easy expressions like O(n), or O(n2), even if - in theory - the LaTeX expressions render much better.
comment:3 follow-up: 4 Changed 16 years ago by
Very good. Trac understand superscripts. So mu last sentence above should read as
Thus I prefer to keep the simple text for easy expressions like O(n)
, or O(n^2)
, even if - in theory - the LaTeX expressions render much better.
Btw can't doxygen generate subscripts/superscripts?
Changed 16 years ago by
Attachment: | doc-impr-c5fd2d996909.patch added |
---|
comment:4 follow-up: 5 Changed 16 years ago by
Replying to alpar:
Thus I prefer to keep the simple text for easy expressions like
O(n)
, orO(n^2)
, even if - in theory - the LaTeX expressions render much better.
I attached the modified changeset [c5fd2d996909].
Btw can't doxygen generate subscripts/superscripts?
It can, since it supports <sup>, </sup>, <sub>, </sub> html tags.
comment:5 Changed 16 years ago by
Resolution: | → fixed |
---|---|
Status: | new → closed |
[259f61026d81] contains various doc improvements: